FAQ |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Bible Versions Questions and discussion about the Bible version issue. |
View Poll Results: What Bible(s) Do You agree With (Approve Of)? | ||||||
All versions | 0 | 0% | ||||
|
||||||
All versions no matter what text they use as long as they translate it as best as possible | 2 | 10.53% | ||||
|
||||||
All versions that come from the TR | 1 | 5.26% | ||||
|
||||||
Only the KJV1611 | 4 | 21.05% | ||||
|
||||||
All KJV editions | 10 | 52.63% | ||||
|
||||||
Only the Pure Cambridge Edition | 1 | 5.26% | ||||
|
||||||
None of the above (please explain) | 1 | 5.26% | ||||
|
||||||
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Which Bible(s) Do You Think Are Good?
I know most here are anti-other versions but this is mainly to see what KJVO view you hold. I recently learnd about the Pure Cambridge Edition only belief.
Last edited by Just_A_Thought; 10-31-2008 at 06:13 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
This quiz is misguided. There is a distinction between a "Bible" and an "edition" of it. (After all there were two editions of the KJB printed in 1611, the "He" edition, and the "She" edition, see Ruth 3:15.)
TEXT TRANSLATION EDITION TEXT. The Traditional Text is superior to the modern text(s); the Textus Receptus is superior to both; the KJB is the final form of the received text. TRANSLATION. The Reformation TR-based translations are superior to modern versions (i.e. translations); the KJB is the best Bible in the world because it is perfect. EDITION. The traditional lineage of KJB editions are the acceptable ones (as compared to modernised and/or newly edited KJV editions), the last and full result of proper traditional edition improvements (fixing up printing errors, standardising spelling, etc.) is a perfect presentation, the Pure Cambridge Edition. (This is not an ongoing or continuing process. "Saviour" is not going to be "improved" to "Savior"; "Easter" is not going to be improved to some other word, etc.) Last edited by bibleprotector; 10-31-2008 at 07:14 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
An excellent translation of a poor text is okay with you, Just_a_thought??
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
After studding the different texts as best as possible (for someone who does not know Hebrew or Greek) I don't think any text is perfect. With this conclusion I feel that you must pick the one who think is best or combine them into one. All texts have good doctrine in them. It is simply more prevalent in some than others. So yes, I am not against any text.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Sounds like that's the problem you're having; no King, no right and wrong. "Where the word of a king is, there is power." (Ecc. 8:4) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This is rediculous...I never said there is no right or wrong. I simply studied, prayed, and studied some more, this is the conclusion I feel God has brought me to. You don't have to agree with me. To claim I am out to simply do what I feel is right and don't care what God has to say is casting judgment that is not true. God bless! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Sounds like Metzger, Westcott, Hort and the rest of the Humanistic German Rationalists. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You said that you think that we should pick and choose what texts we think best. Therefore, you are deciding what is right and wrong based on feelings, not facts. How is that taking anything out of context? That's simply stating what you said in less ambiguous terms. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You don't share you email on your profile (which is odd to say the least) so if you would let me know how I can email it to you I will send it your way as soon as you do. In the mean time you can browse through: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible...king_james.htm http://www.samgipp.com/historybook/ http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/kjvdefen.htm Peace and Love, Stephen |
|
|