FAQ |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() YOU STUPID TONGUE-TALKERS, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "SLAIN IN THE SPIRIT" !!! http://bible-believers.phpbb3now.com...php?f=15&t=143 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would appreciate it, "1611isperfect", if you could tone down the rhetoric. Your subject line will not cause weaker, unlearned brethren to be brought to knowledge. It only serves to cause greater offense.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
In fact, if you look up 'stupid' in the websters 1828 (which is what I did before I started using it), it specifically says "a foolish person". If Jesus were around today, and he wandered into a church where things like this were going on he would definately say something, and it would probably include, "you people are stupid, and you can't even see what you're doing". Or... the Elizabethian English version: "Ye fools, and blind". Btw- I'm not just trying to be obtuse here. Have you even watched the videos yet? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You should have then left your original wording,
Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I appreciate your "zeal" for the Lord, but on the other hand, in this case I believe it is misplaced. WHO on this Forum are you addressing? Or WHO on this Forum are you trying to teach, inform or edify? Or WHO on this Forum are you trying to warn, admonish, reprove, or rebuke? Just exactly WHO did you address this "message" to? If you will check out my posts you will find that I do not hesitate to stand up for the Holy words of God or for those men who have defended it these many years. I have not "shied-away" from taking on those people who have come to this Forum who, I believe, have attacked the Scriptures; or who, have unjustly maligned, falsely charged, or defamed brethren who have defended the Scriptures; or who, have unjustly attacked other people on the Forum; or who, have embraced clear & evident "heresy". On the other hand, I do not just "flail out" in all directions and loosely get in to "name-calling" (i.e. "stupid") without being very "specific", such as: "Humanist", "Sophist", "Compromiser", "Carnal", "Backbiter", "Railer", "False Accuser", "Blasphemer", "Heretic", "Reprobate", "Wolves", etc., etc. - I'm sure you get the idea. (It is far more "effective" to be specific, than to just brand people as being "stupid"). 1 Corinthians 9:26 I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: One last thing - I doubt very much that there are very many people on this Forum that put much stock in the "Charasmatic" nonsense you pointed out. In other words you are basically "preaching to the choir". So, what was the purpose of your post, if most (if not all) of us here on this Forum are already very much aware of what goes on in some Charasmatic circles? Are we to condemn all Charasmatics (Pentacostals), because some of them participate in wild behavior - "snake handling", "fainting", screaming, babbling, etc. - that is clearly not Biblical? Are we to condemn them all because they have embraced false doctrine? Are we ever going to be able to persuade any of them of the false doctrine they have embraced if we call them "Stupid"? I trow not! There is a time and place to "persuade" (teaching & convincing); there is a time and a place to "contend" (warning & admonishing); and there is a time and place to "condemn" (reproving & rebuking). I do not believe that this is the "time" or the "place" for your post - especially since it was not directed at anyone in particular. ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rom 10:2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
Because some of us don't have a clearer understanding of things in the bible, we tend to be over zealous in our approach to defending our beliefs, even though they could be not quite right. And if we look at history, over overzealous attitudes have made victims pay some serious consequences. Peace>>>AJ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I need to make sure that I am not drinking coffee or milk while reading your posts sometimes, Look. I can always count on you for a good chuckle, though. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Because there is the interpretation of hell being a real place doesn't mean that there can not be an opposite interpretation of hell not being a real place. Because one interprets the bible one way does not mean the bible is not open to other interpretations. I bring a different view of the same bible and one whose foundation is Christ. I was brought up in the Southern Baptist traditions along with their views. So, I am not foreign to what you state. But you are foreign to what I state because you haven't heard of my views except on here. There is more to God then what we have been thought simply by looking into His word to find answers. If we are open to understanding the scope of Gods works rather then understanding only what mankind thinks should be Gods works, then we can see through a glass darkly clearly. Peace>>>AJ |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If this thread didn't already have some good replies in it, I would have deleted it.
1611isperfect, you need to dial it down a few notches. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've been talking to this pentecostal guy on my forum and I have showed him verse after verse trying to explain to him that tongues are not for today. I'm going to show you some of his responses to what one of my members said. Please give your thoughts.
Quote:
|
|
|