FAQ |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
We have to be careful of new "truths" such as the Gap Theory". Prior to the late 1800's nobody ever read a gap into Gen 1:1-2. “if it is new it is not true, and if it is true it is not new.”
"These long-overlooked “biblical truths” include the following: 1. Angels are thirty-three year old males without wings; and all woman in the Church Age will receive thirty-three year old male bodies at the Rapture. ... 2. The plan of salvation for Tribulation saints is faith plus works and the plan of salvation in the Millennium is works alone. 3. When the believer is born again, his soul is literally cut loose from the inside of his fleshly body. (Ruckman takes spiritual circumcision very literally!) 4. Demons re winged creatures ranging in size from those of flies and mosquitoes to eagles and vultures. 5. Sexual unions constitute marriage in God’s sight. On page 347 of The Unknown Bible, Ruckman modestly claims: “Do you realize that in these last two chapters, you have learned a dozen things that were unknown to the greatest Bible teachers in the world? In 2000 years of church history, they haven’t even been able to find the passage which dealt with these things we have been talking about.” " (from www.wayoflife.org) As to Ruckman's newness... “If you are able to obtain a copy [of Ruckman’s proposed new book] you will have, in your hands, a minimum of 200 advanced revelations that came from the inerrant English text, that were completely overlooked (or ignored) by every major Christian scholar since 90 A.D. This would include all of the modern Bible revisors (1800-1999), all of the faculty members and staffs of every major “Fundamental” (Conservative and Evangelical) seminary, university, and college in Europe and America since 1500, and every Greek and Hebrew scholar (or teacher) since 1611. ... Actually, if a Bible believer has this work he will have the accumulated knowledge of Cornelius Stam and Ethelbert Bullinger ... Clarence Larkin and C.I. Scofield Ewing, Osborne, Tilton, and PTL ... Pember, Peters, Gaebelein, Pentecost, Lindsey, Kirban, Rockwood, Webber, and Van Impe ... plus the Puritans, Reformers, major evangelists (Moody, Sunday, Finney, Torrey, Wesley, etc.) and all that ANY Greek and Hebrew scholar ... ever found out--that was SO--in the last 200 years” (Bible Believers’ Bulletin, Jan. 1994, pp. 2,4). |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, so is there another KJV only Bible Institute in this country beside the PBI? Not that I'm trying to prove anything, but I'm just curious since so many of these Christian Colleges had totally went over to MV....
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
There are various sound Independant Fundamental Baptist colleges that are KJVonly, such as Oklahoma Baptist College, Crown College, and some others.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
I know that some of those colleges use the KJV but I have heard that some of them do not believe that it is infallible, they just believe it's the best one out there. Is that true?
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
I know those two particular ones - plus Faithway Baptist College in Ontario - are definitely KJVonly - by conviction, not preference.
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
thats what happened in one of them.
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
I read Ruckman's stuff for only 2 reasons:
1. He's great on historical facts surrounding the KJB (not to mention how well he refutes modern "higher criticism"). 2. He makes me laugh. However, I would encourage caution regarding his "biblical doctrine". He has some good insights in his commentary on The Book of Revelation. "Eat the meat and spit out the bones". There are a lot of bones. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Pastor Mikie,
No offense, but couldn't there be alot of "bones" since you and Dr. Ruckman consist of two different denominations? Because I do know that he has books that refute speaking in tounges. If I am correct you do believe in tounges, right? |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
1 Corinthians 2:13 |
|
|