[George]

Originally Posted by Tmonk

"they burn all copies of the Alexandrian text only."

Could you post a link with some info on this ?

Ahh, Tmonk,

You finally have crawled out of your hole! You LURK in the background and look for opportunities to strike; and when you do your TRUE character is revealed:

These men are just exactly like the “scribes” and “Pharisees” of old: Always asking QUESTIONS [“Why” – Mark 7:5, “How” – Mark 2:16, “What” – John 11:47; “When” – Luke 17:20]; always trying to “catch” a genuine Bible believer “in his words” [Mark 12:13] or trying to “entangle” him in his talk [Matthew 22:15]; always making “accusations” [Matthew 9:34]; always “critical” [Mark 2:16]; always “provoking” [Luke 11:53]; always “murmuring” [Luke 5:30]; always “tempting” [Matthew 19:3]; always getting “offended” [Matthew 15:12]; never answering questions directed at them [Matthew 21:24-27]; and they are always HYPOCRITES! [Matthew 23: 13-15].

Don't you have enough DISCERNMENT to know when someone is JOKING? Are you that dense and obtuse that you cannot tell the difference between a sincere statement and extreme sarcasm? Or are you just being contrary - like your recently departed "friend" (Birds of a feather flock together) solabiblia?

As soon as one goes - another takes his place!

Psalms 92:5 O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.
6 A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.

[Brother Tim]

Seriously?

Brandon, you got me! I followed the link, thinking that there was actually some real facts in a MVer's post.

[peopleoftheway]

Originally Posted by Diligent

Seriously?

http://tinyurl.com/dz6rx9

Thanks Brother, that made me smile

Originally Posted by Gord

At the risk of appearing older than Moses, in the old days these guys like solabiblia we called "TROLLS".

They get their kicks in life being antagonistic, arrogant, and just plain know it all's.

At 88 responses so far he's winning.

Many of the replies were not to solabiblia, he didn't start the thread. He's not winning anything, he's not even on the right "track." And now he is banned.

[Brother Jerry]

It's fairly simple, perhaps too simple for those who find satisfaction in their own knowledge...

There is only one who would like for us all to be without a Bible.

This is a war for our souls. I will not give my sword to some scholar, never!

My Lord Jesus Christ says I need it more than food!

[tonybones2112]

Originally Posted by Tmonk

"they burn all copies of the Alexandrian text only."

Could you post a link with some info on this ?

Ask Sola, I posed to him the Alexandrian Paradox. All the Alexandrian texts are traced to one author, they are all early, and only 45 in number. All the early Majority texts were decayed through use and are represented by relatively "late" manuscripts. A clear archaeological proof that the Alexandrian texts were rejected. There are 13-15,000 Greek and Latin manuscripts for the Majority text. If it were rejected there should be at least that many late Alexandrian texts IF it were legitimate. There are none. So Sola poses they were all burned and destroyed in "...the Muslim invasions". I can see that...

"Ahmed, do these books have I John 5:7?"
"Just one, the rest are missing it."
"Good, then burn those, and save this one to confuse the infidels..."

These Jesuit plants need some new responses, they are dragging the bottom of the barrel.

Glaze and peas

Bonez

[Mathew Ward]

Where does a KJVP fit in or a TRO?

[Luke]

The FFF :P

Just kidding

TRO is a bit of a misnomer.. it would imply you only read the TR, only preach from the TR etc etc. TRO are KJBP.

It's great how we have invented our own little anagrams and know what they mean!

[Greektim]

Originally Posted by Luke

The FFF :P

Just kidding

TRO is a bit of a misnomer.. it would imply you only read the TR, only preach from the TR etc etc. TRO are KJBP.

It's great how we have invented our own little anagrams and know what they mean!

If I ever changed my textual view, I would move to TRO but not necessarily KJP. Perhaps NKJP . Is there really no such thing as a TRO in your opinion?

[Luke]

Not unless he is a greek speaking man living in 90AD or thereabouts.

But then, they wouldn't have had the TR at that time anyway. So I must ask the question, where were the perfect words of God before the TR!

The TR (there are about 5), was compiled/translated whatever, in the 1500's, as far as I am aware.