[Bill]

With liberal politicians considered great heroes of liberation for black and underpriveleged people, I think the following basic principles of liberal policy should be considered.
The assumption supporting abortion is that certain people can be classified as subhuman (between animal and human). This was done to blacks by the slave system that liberals claim to oppose. This reclassification as subhuman was also done to the underpriveleged by eugenics, a philosophy of which Margaret Sanger was a part. Jewish professionals, who saw nothing wrong with eugenics untill they were the ones being treated as subhuman, could have taken action to pre-empt the Holocaust before it happened by opposing eugenics when they had some control.
The redistributive economic policies demanded by the left-wing politicians (and some neo-conservatives) are the same as slave economics. Reciprocal economics (free exchange of good and services among free people) is the way free people do business.
By enticing people with historically the most to lose from slavery and oppression by offering conficated tax money and positions in organizations, the left wing politicians have provided the means for a re-occurance of past abuses with the co-operation of the abused. People who glorify the progress of blacks and underpriveleged in the recent past should consider if that would have been possible if the abused had originally been in agreement with their abusers. I suspect that the people benefitting from socialism are being set up.

Many people have no idea about the radical socialist ideals of the president's father in Africa, Obama Senior:

1. Obama's father advocated the communal ownership of land and the forced confiscation of privately controlled land, as part of a forced “development plan”, an important element of his attack on the government’s advocacy of private ownership, land titles, and property registration. (p. 29)

2. Obama's father advocated the nationalization of “European” and “Asian” owned enterprises, including hotels, with the control of these operations handed over to the “indigenous” black population. (pp. 32 -33)

3. Obama's father advocated dramatically increasing taxation on “the rich” even up to the 100% level, arguing that, “there is no limit to taxation if the benefits derived from public services by society measure up to the cost in taxation which they have to pay” (p. 30) and that, “Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.” (p. 31)
more here:
http://prestopundit.wordpress.com/20...m-his-readers/
http://obamaism.blogspot.com/

[Winman]

Well, I think most people (excluding liberals) understand that the Welfare State is responsible for the breakdown of the family, especially the African American family in America. Often black people are not as well educated or skilled as others and so cannot get "good" jobs that pay well. It is often easier to live well in single parent households that can get many benefits (wrongly called entitlements) from the government. A single woman with children can get low cost housing, free medical, food stamps, and many other benefits. It is to her advantage to stay single and continue to have children in order to continue to receive benefits.

The man is left out (which the feminists want) of the family equation. Many go from woman to woman, living off of them and fathering many children.

The children who grow up in the households suffer the most, they usually do not have the direction of a father which is very important. So often as they get a little older, they get involved with gangs and crime and the like. They often do not get a good education themselves, so it is a vicious cycle that keeps repeating itself.

This is nothing more than a modern form of slavery. In the past, slaves were forbidden an education, in order to force them to be dependent on their masters. The modern system accomplishes the exact same goal.

I personally believe that some in high places are doing this deliberately. While they say they want to secure rights, freedoms, and opportunity for minorities, in reality they want to keep them enslaved and in subjection.

What is clever about these folks is that they play the race card. They preach to these poor minorities that they are being held back and down by the rich white folks, especially Republicans, when it is the liberals themselves who are keeping these folks enslaved in poverty and ignorance. How clever.