[Luke]

Ignoring the oxford cambridge thing, which I see as a non issue, the Old Scofield is pretty good as far as notes go.

Good notes on most dispensational stuff, although dispensationalism, being relatively newly revealed (or re-revealed, since it is a doctrine that had been hidden during the dark ages), men were still learning.

Personally, the major issue I take with Scofields notes is the same thing I take with Larkin's charts - Gap theory. But whatever. I can deal with that. I pretty much fully understand gap theory, but cannot embrace it because I find too many scriptures that are ambigious, and often, the less obvious meaning to the scripture is taken to support the gap. He also says Leviathan was a crocodile and Behemoth was a hippo, but the rest of his notes are pretty good