[Bill]

Feminist Theology (FT) or Christian Feminism may be a category of Liberation Theology but I think it should be considered separately because the methods I've seen used to nullify scripture are different. FT makes false use of context in interpretation to change the meaning and application of scriptural instruction without changing the words.
Radical Feminism, which is rejected by conservative and moderate Christians, rejects the whole Bible by assigning it a context of distant past culture not applicable today.
Moderate Christian Feminism selectively perverts the meaning of verses that are incompatible with gnostic androgyny and accepts the rest of the Bible. This allows scriptural words to remain unchanged but any application of Biblical instruction contrary to gnostic androgyny is labeled as legalism.
A prominint example making false use of context is as follows: ! Timothy 2: 11-15 gives instructions for men and women teaching and learning by applying a principle based on creation and the first sin in the Garden of Eden. The instructions include that women should not usurp authority over men. The way moderate Christianity removes this obstacle to the comprehensive practice of androgyny is to limit the instruction to apply only in the church or in church activities, as if people have a variable ancestry; descended from Adam and Eve while in church and evolved from primordial slime or created by aliens while away from church. Some teachers limit this further so only the senior pastor is considered to be descended from Adam and Eve.
In real interpretation, when a basic principle is given to be applied to a specific situation, the parameters of the this basic principle are the parameters of application of the instruction. If no basic principle is given, the parameters of application are the context of the situation.
In deceptive interpretation, when a basic principle is applied to a specific situation, the characteristics of the situation are falsely used to place contextual limits on the Biblical instruction.
When a parent discerns that a child has reached an adequate level of responsibility, the child is shown a previously inaccessible cabinet containing poisonous materials such as cleaning fluids (clorox, ets.). This child is taught the proper use of the supplies and given such basic safety principles as to not drink the clorox. The child will be able to comprehend the difference between a basic principle to be applied in every situation (context) and a situationally relative instruction. The child will know that taking the clorox bottle out of the house and across the street will not change the poisonous nature of its contents. The context in which the principle is given, in the house with mother present, will not be the contextual limits of application of the basic principle. This is established everyday communication successfully used by ordinary people.
Feminist influence toward androgyny has had some very detrimental consequences. When the guidelines for heterosexual attitudes are replaced with androgyny, any relationship between men and women is spiritually and psychologically homosexual and only heterosexual physically, as the development of the phyisal body is guided by DNA/RNA or whatever contains God's instructions. In order for heterosexual men and women to have heterosexual relations they must be superficial, separating the non-physical from the physical. Promiscuous sex and pornography are two ways of accomplishing this. These are correctly seen as wrong by contemporary Christianity but the gnostic androgyny which causes this is accepted.