FAQ |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You may be doing yourself a dis-service by keeping to that strict rule of not reading commentaries. I have found that there are commentators that have studied the Bible as a whole much more extensively than I have and I can learn from them. But I can see why you would not want to read commentaries re: tongues. Here's a great example of a commentary you most likely would not appreciate even though it has scripture reference to back up every point. Quote:
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
You've about persuaded me. Not about speaking in tongues, but to purchase The Way of Life Encyclopedia .
Having been involved in Pentecostalism I can testify to so much of what the encyclopedia says about tongues speaking. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
The Bible sure sheds a lot of light on the commentaries. A dictionary (1828 Websters for example) is something I find useful. I've studied the Bible since 1973 and found many commentaries kind of dry reading. I have used them. Matthew Henry is my favourite. Others I have read tried to change the meaning of what my Bible said by using the "original word" Bible correcting technique which turns me completely off.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Beth, please don't take this as a criticism off how you do your personal Bible studies. I'm only speaking for myself.
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Except for the sarcasm, I agree with Revangelist. I might also add that it is futile to continue to try and persuade us to believe as you do. I don't see it happening. Keep this in mind, too: Pentecostals aren't your enemies. We are on your side -
Mark 9:40 For he that is not against us is on our part. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I have found that in almost every topic that I'm confused on I can find the answer with this software. The Way of Life Encyclopedia will take a topic and then point out everywhere through out the Bible where this topic is mentioned. It's a great way to learn by taking the Bible as a whole. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Beth, I can say ditto to you, since I believe I'm pointing out Biblical truth. We just happen to disagree on interpreting it. I will continue to point out error. I'm hearing (and reading) God's Word and believe I'm believing correctly.
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I don't doubt at all that you have had this experience. You say you have compared this experience to the Bible, although, what you explain as your tongues experience does not compare to the Biblical examples. The Bible clearly explains that people were able to understand what others that spoke different languages were saying in their own tongue. No where in scripture does it describe the tongues we hear today or the tongues you have explained as your experience. The tongues you speak of are easy to imitate and from what I hear from many that have come out of the Pentecostal movement, there is much pressure to imitate these babblings. It is nonsense when heard by others. Our God is not a God of confusion. If I heard Biblical tongues today, I would hear a language that I didn't understand, (an unknown language) but there would be someone there that would be able to interpret what the person was saying. I would not hear strange babblings repeated over and over again, I would recognize it as a foreign language although not understand what the person was saying. Or I would hear someone that spoke a different language, speak in my language. I believe as the Bible says, that this was a sign for the Jews as prophesied in Isaiah and this miraculous gift is no longer available. We certainly don't see this miraculous gift today. What we see is a corrupted version of the gift. So yes, we all have experiences. We must try the spirit of these experiences. We are cautioned against seducing spirits. What do these Pentecostal teachers tell us about tongues. Some say it is a special gift for special Christians, (extreme piety). Some say only those with the gift have received a special (second) blessing. Isn't this teaching focused more on the individual and their specialness then for the furthering of the gospel of Christ and the edification in God's Word? Try, try, try the spirits. Quote:
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Acts 2:1 ¶And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.
2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. 3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. 4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. They were in the upper room in a prayer meeting and spoke in tongues with out interpretation. Acts 2:5 ¶And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. 6 Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. 7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? 8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? Now, they are outdoors, out of the upper room and Jews from other nations heard in their own language. 1 Corinthians 14:2 For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries. This is speaking to God directly. 1 Corinthians 14:14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. 15 ¶What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also. Again Paul is praying and singing in tongues. His understanding is unfruitful. Only God understood him. Last edited by Revangelist; 03-31-2008 at 02:07 PM. |
|
|