FAQ |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Ray comfort way and Paul's way
Acts 17 is a perfect example of no law being preached and people being saved.
So Is Ray comfort's way of the master a Biblically correct way to witness or street preach? with the Jews Paul uses scripture but to prove Christ is the Messiah not to convict Jews of sin and not keeping the law. When Paul speaks of the law being lawful when used lawfully he is not speaking of witnessing but a lifestyle. when Paul speaks of the Law being school master leading them to Christ. He is speaking to Jews as to the purpose of the law. not to convict of Gentiles of sin. With the Gentiles in Acts 17, Paul uses Philosophic and Stoick reasoning and their own poets to point to judgement of the dead by Christ whom God raised from the dead. he did not try to get them to see if they kept all the laws of the Jews but rather said that nature and ll things created were to help them find God if they so felt moved by those to find Him. I think the reason men create these methods is because of lack of faith that men will beleive the simple gospel. so in order to be able to count how many came to Christ you would need systems of evangelism that were only developed in these last days of the last days. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Exactly Brother Chette!
Courses / programs that men have designed, another horrible example if I may give is the alpha course and I would like at some point in time to write an article on this, as billboards and posters have appeared all over my home town and outside some Churches. But back to "way of the master" it sounds more like a martial arts movie than anything pertaining to the Gospel of The LORD Jesus Christ. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
"Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:" (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).
Hello Brother Chette. Men do indeed complicate and, in many cases, corrupt the gospel of Christ--making it fit their particular level of understanding or frame of reference. Like you, I also believe that Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father but by Him. We should not "add" to the simplicity of Christ and the message of redemption. I do not know Brother Ray Comfort personally, but I've always sensed that he simply puts a lot of emphasis on "how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures" by using the the Law to show that Jesus Christ died for our sins. I love that verse in 1 John that says He is "...the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 John 2:2). I certainly believe it's permitted for us to use the "Ten Commandments" to show a person his or her sinfulness and need of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. In saying that, I firmly believe that if we simply preach Jesus Christ, and Him crucified, men will be saved. He is enough! Last edited by Forrest; 09-20-2008 at 10:48 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I agree. it is not harmful to use the ten commandments to show you can't keep them. but at the same time you are telling people in essence they must keep them. so after salvation you have people trying to keep them(mind you not all). the the essence of law keeping or lack there of is the basis of their need of salvation, not conviction of the Holy Ghost that Christ Died for them and bore ALL their sin upon the tree. not just their lack of not keeping ten commandments. the truth is Chrsit died to keep anyone who would beleive from going to Eternal punishment because of God righteous decree that the soul that sins shall die.
What do they do when they come across some one who has kept all the Ten Commandments? Paul said he did. but I wont cut fellwoship with Ray or anyone using the way of the master. but always better to keep it simple, teach it simple. Last edited by chette777; 09-20-2008 at 07:02 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Rom 7:7 What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What is Paul saying here. He is saying that is was the law that showed him his sin. God bless. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Personally, I've never witnessed to anyone who has passed the test of the "Ten Commandments." One lie? One lust? One theft? One time taking God's name in vain? How many times do you need to lie in order to be a liar? Instead of implying they must keep the law, I think the trust of many who are using the law as a schoolmaster, is to allow the Holy Spirit to show a person the impossibility of keeping or obeying the law. Remember, we also teach, "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all" (James 2:10). You said, "What do they do when they come across some one who has kept all the Ten Commandments? Paul said he did." When did the Apostle Paul say he came across individuals who actually kept the Ten Commandments? I can't recall at this time. Remind me of the Scripture for that. I could see the possibility of coming across someone who "claims" to be a keeper of the law. Do you think there are persons who have actually kept every commandment, all of their life? Every thought? Every word? Every deed? |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
My point is in the scriptures not even Paul uses the law to convict Gentiles of sin.
list out all of Paul's preachings in the book of Acts he never uses the law. but many were saved. What make Ray's way better than Paul's? Last edited by chette777; 09-21-2008 at 07:21 AM. |
|
|