Global-warming myth
May 16, 2008 Washington Times

On May Day, Noah Keenlyside of Germany's Leipzig Institute of Marine Science, published a paper in NATURE forecasting no additional global warming "over the next decade."

Al Gore and his minions continue to chant that "the science is settled" on global warming, but the only thing settled is that there has not been any since 1998. Critics of this view (rightfully) argue that 1998 was the warmest year in modern record, due to a huge El Nino event in the Pacific Ocean, and that it is unfair to start any analysis at a high (or a low) point in a longer history. But starting in 2001 or 1998 yields the same result: no warming.

The Keenlyside team found that natural variability in the Earth's oceans will "temporarily offset" global warming from carbon dioxide. Seventy percent of the Earth's surface is oceanic; hence, what happens there greatly influences global temperature. It is now known that both Atlantic and Pacific temperatures can get "stuck," for a decade or longer, in relatively warm or cool patterns. The North Atlantic is now forecast to be in a cold stage for a decade, which will help put the damper on global warming. Another Pacific temperature pattern is forecast not to push warming, either.

Science no longer provides justification for any rush to pass drastic global warming legislation...
more here:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-warming-myth/

Global Waming Myth?
The end is not near, instead of panicking, adjust
ABC NEWS
John Stossel
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=3061015&page=1

[kittn1]

When I am FREEZING in below-normal temperatures for November, I find it really difficult to lend any credence to global warming.........

[MC1171611]

No no no...now it's no longer "Global Warming": they've realized how stupid it looks, so to try to regain some of their lost credibility outside of the world of scientific ignoramuses, they've renamed it "Climate Change." This way they can blame it on you no matter what the weather does.

Retards.

Personally I think this movement will bring more impact to our nation and our lives at every level than almost any other. And I'm not talking about the concept of "climate change," I'm talking about the movement that is using this nonsense to force their agenda on us at every turn.

A few items from my archives...

Many around us have bought in to the "green revolution,"
but do you think it's possible that the Global Warming Movement has nothing to do with the environment, that it's just a smokescreen for socialists who want to destroy and then restructure our economy with "carbon credit taxation?"

Many Americans believe new mantra of socialism in the U.S. is "CLIMATE CHANGE,"
here are a few articles...

Global Warming has its roots in Socialism
Don't forget Claude Allegre is one of France's most prominent SOCIALISTS, and he pretty much started the Global Warming Movement---although he has recently changed his own views, you can read that here:
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/sto...5-fc28f14da388

Environmental Alarmists have a bad track record
This is really funny: for more of the insanity promoted by the alarmist "Earth Day" crowd,* take a look here at the smart comments by Walter E. Williams, Ph.D.:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.p...w&pageId=63542

Dr. Roger Revelle
Gore's Mentor and*Harvard professor, Dr. Roger Revelle wrote the following before he died, 'The scientific base for a greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time,'
http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/...new_world.html

The Petition Project
Over 30,000 scientists have signed a petition to debunk the Global Warming Myth of climate change...
Many of the signers currently work in climatological, meteorological, atmospheric, environmental, geophysical, astronomical, and biological fields directly involved in the climate change controversy.*It is evident that 31,072 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,021 PhDs, are not "a few." Moreover, from the clear and strong petition statement that they have signed, it is evident that these 31,072 American scientists are not “skeptics.”*These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counterproductively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth...
http://www.petitionproject.org/index.html
http://www.petitionproject.org/gwdat..._Petition.html

Have you read the writings of Alan Caruba,
just to hear another side of the story---see here:
http://www.michnews.com/artman/publi...le_20044.shtml
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4144
http://autarchic.tripod.com/files/earthday.html

Weather Channel Founder says sue Al Gore for Fraud:
By now most people are aware that the founder of The Weather Channel, John Coleman, said global warming is "the greatest scam in history" last November.*On Monday, while speaking at the*2008 International Conference on Climate Changebeing held in New York City, Coleman took his criticisms further by advocating that all those involved in the sale and marketing of carbon credits, including Al Gore, should be sued "to finally put some light on the fraud of global warming.”
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...-warming-fraud
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...s_al_gore.html

Newsweek Acknowledges Cracks in Global Warming Hoax
You know the global warming hoax is running out of gas when even knee-jerk liberal Newsweek admits that not everyone is on board with the hysterical "consensus." The April 16 issue includes a surprisingly sane editorial by MIT Professor of Meteorology Richard Lindzen.
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/...ek_acknow.html

Radical socialist greens are out to damage industry
and restructure the world economy...
it really has very little to do with the the environment. Just a few weeks ago the liberals in Congress were trying to pass a mammoth taxation bill designed to force corporations to buy "credits" in order to operate on American soil. Senate leader Mitch McConnell said the proposed system of allowing widespread trading of carbon emissions allowances would produce "the largest restructuring of the American economy since the New Deal." Thankfully it was blocked... for now...
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/...te.climate.ap/

[Forrest]

Originally Posted by kittn1

When I am FREEZING in below-normal temperatures for November, I find it really difficult to lend any credence to global warming.........

Sister Laura, I grew up in Houston, Texas. Our summers have always been "hot" and our winters "cold"--well cold to me...like 40 degrees or so. Bhrrrr!

First the green radicals went after our car emissions.
Now they are going after YOUR EMISSIONS, including children...

The caps in the excerpt below are mine for emphasis...

Global Warming Alarmists Propose
Limiting Population...

In a statistical study entitled “Reproduction and the Carbon Legacies of Individuals,” published in Global Environmental Change by Murtaugh and Shlax of Oregon State University, and again published here , the authors propose that the potential savings from reduced reproduction rates among humans are some 20 times more effective than the savings wrought by life style changes.

It is clear that the authors follow the Liberal mantra of the ends justify the means. If we can reduce carbon emissions by reducing the number of children, then we should do it, they gloat. It appears that carbon reductions trump even “life” itself. They summarize:

"Much attention has been paid to the ways that people’s home energy use, travel, food choices and other routine activities affect their EMISSIONS of carbon dioxide and, ultimately, their contributions to global warming. However, the reproductive choices of an individual are rarely incorporated into calculations of his personal impact on the environment. Here we estimate the extra EMISSIONS of fossil carbon dioxide that an average individual causes when he or she chooses to have children. The summed EMISSIONS of a person’s descendants, weighted by their relatedness to him, may far exceed the LIFETIME EMISSIONS produced by the original parent. Under current conditions in the United States, for example, each child adds about 9441 metric tons of carbon dioxide to the carbon legacy of an average female, which is 5.7 times her LIFETIME EMISSIONS. A person’s reproductive choices must be considered along with his day-to-day activities when assessing his ultimate impact on the global environment."
MORE HERE:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...sts_propo.html

[Winman]

Bro. Parrish, I like your articles, we have a lot of subjects in common.

Yeah, Global Warming is a myth. Money is behind this lie somewhere, it always is.

The truth is, the Sun has been radiating less heat since 1998, and there has also been a dearth of sunspots. The world is getting colder, not hotter.

Look at this article dated 01/30/09

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...etting-colder/

Here's an article about sunspot activiity

http://www.smm.org/buzz/blog/where-h...-sunspots-gone

And MC1171611 is correct, the media has now started to say "climate change" and dropped global warming. Apparently they must have looked into the matter and found out Al Gore was wrong.