I'm not sure I understand the argument here and sometimes I think we are straining at gnats and swallowing camels
....I have been studying this site off and on since March and while I am certainly KJVO, I sometimes find love and charity hard to find in some of the discussions.....someone already said the common sense truth....how did anyone get saved before 1611?? Is there another dispensation for the KJV?? What version did Paul have when he was converted on the Damascus Road?? I believe the trouble with the other perversions is that when studying how they came about, there seems to be an agenda attached [doctrine and money] to them....This is why JW's can take their version and "prove" to some unsuspecting soul that Jesus Christ has not actually been here on earth yet [by removing Christ and Jesus in strategic areas throughout].....but a person that is born again and saved isn't going to know or stop believing because of the textual errors in other perversions......someone hit it on the head, I really believe that the new perversions promote "easy believism" if that is a term and they are easy for the modern contemporary movement [earthly, sensual]......we all as KJV people need to state our cases with love and humility without which it would be hard for others to take us too seriously....God's Blessings.....