View Single Post
  #29  
Old 07-31-2008, 05:47 PM
cookiemonster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblestudent View Post
[B]The Incarnate Word of God came on earth and will come again on earth. ... I see no point in the Bible's emphasis on the eternality of the Word of God when it is lost in this planet ... That the word of the Lord endureth forever makes sense on earth where corruption exists.
There seems to be a disconnect between your first two statements - you seem to acknowledge that the Incarnate, Living Word - Jesus Christ - was on earth, and is no longer on earth, but will come again; why not the Written Word?

Is it pointless for God to emphasize that Jesus Christ is eternal, but that He is no longer physically here on earth? If it isn't pointless, then why not also the Written Word?

Yes, there is corruption on earth - why did God take Jesus Christ back to heaven when it seems like He is more needed here on earth, right now, and in the past 2000 years? Wouldn't it make more sense that God would keep Him here? Why can't this argument be made also for the written Word of God?