Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro. Parrish
Simple brother I wanted to know what you thought about it.
I didn't start the thread, Brandon.
I actually tried to avoid the dispute on several occasions and still am—look at all my posts and you will see that.
As is mine.
Well by all means shut it down I don't care.
Tony is suggesting that believer's baptism (which is not confined to Baptist Theology, in fact I wasn't even baptized in a Baptist church!) is a dead work of the Mosaic law. As I understand it, that's Bullingerism. I'm not offended, angry or juggling donuts, but that is bad doctrine, and it should be exposed for what it is—no matter who is involved. It won't negate my love for Tony but it is what it is.
|
I've shown water baptism, and I don't use this as a cuss-word as "hyperdispensationalist" or "Bullengerite" is used against those like me, but I've shown water baptism to be hyperdenominationalism. If I am teaching bad doctrine, show me Scripture that it's bad, brother. Expose it. Brother, you didn't start the thread but you are as of this minute still participating in it. That's what I am waiting on, someone to expose it,
with Scripture. I threw down no glove, I'm standing for what the Scriptures teach. If I am "pushing" the issue of water baptism not being efficacious for anything today,
why are so many pushing back so hard? Why the opposition to simple Scripture with Scripture definition, brother?
Now, I'm not going to compare anybody to anything, I'm just going to stand on my convictions unto death as Peter did with the Jews in Acts 10 brother. I don't blame you for standing on yours, or Brandon on his, you've offered personal comments and little to no Scripture I can remember brother. Let's not have a barfight, let's talk Scripture.
Grace and peace brother Parrish
Tony