View Single Post
  #12  
Old 12-13-2008, 12:57 PM
TimV
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
You dishonor your posts when you falsely rush to accuse of a "mistake" apparently not even reading carefully. There may be some mistakes here and there in my posts, however my writing on Edersheim above was accurate.
No, your remark about Edersheim was not
Quote:
Note: Edersheim himself was buffeted by the common Greek OT error"
it was
Quote:
Note: Edersheim himself was buffeted by the common Greek OT error and while skeptical of "the so-called LXX version" he was not emphasizing how the Greek had been smoothed and tampered to the NT.
and that is a false statement. Edersheim wrote 5 pages about the Septuagint, and in those 5 pages says nothing about him being skeptical. That is something you added, hopefully mistakenly and not maliciously. Edersheim says, point blank, that New Testament authors quoted from it, and during the time of Christ it was as common and loved as the King James Version was in England during it mid 1800s.