Quote:
In my opinion, the "mother's life is in danger" argument is a false argument, because the percentage of pregnancies that truly 'need' to be terminated for that reason are so infinitesimal as to be practically non-existent. And I don't believe in the 'rape/incest' exceptions, either. |
Aussiemama, yes the Commandment says not to kill. But Samuel hewed Agag in pieces. God told the Israelites to wipe out every person that lived in Jericho, and in turn the entirety of Canaan. God killed Ananias and Saphira. The list goes on and on. Simply saying that killing someone is wrong without checking the circumstances doesn't work.
I'd recommend just leaving it here: cases where abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother are so rare that they are the exception, not the rule, and they are referred to most of the time just so people can excuse killing a child that they don't want to be responsible for. No one says it's the right thing to do if that circumstance happens to occur, but Biblically it would be the better thing. Children are an heritage, but God creates an inseperable bond between a man and a woman that should not be broken by anything, children included. (This coming from a guy who strongly believes every doctor that has performed an abortion should be executed for murder by the government of his/her own state.) |
Quote:
In fact, I suspect that "dweeb" can probably be traced, etymologically speaking, to "zoom dweebie," although the meanings are different. Kinda like what's happened to "gay." There is only one slang word (an adjective) I know of that has maintained its precise meaning throughout many decades: it is used by teenagers today exactly as it was by teenagers fifty years ago. (It's not dirty.) Can you guess what it is? |
Quote:
Seriously, I don't care if a member of the forum thinks babies are born on mars and fly here on purple UFO's, we can still show them the respect of not calling them or their ideas "obsessed" or "blinded" or "ignorant," or "retarded." I'm hoping we all agree on this, even if no one here is polite enough to apologize for the remarks. I do agree with you 100% when you say the percentage of pregnancies that truly 'need' to be terminated for that reason are so infinitesimal as to be practically non-existent, and I know you and I agree on the heart of the issue. :) Quote:
is the word: COOL? |
Quote:
more like...'Cool Bro'.:D Billie |
"Here Am I", you need to examine the quotes that you are using to justify your use of harsh words.
Who said them? To whom was He speaking? |
Thanks for clearing that up, VR.
Quote:
|
Quote:
My point is this: sometimes it's okay to use harsher terms towards others. "Name-calling" isn't always a bad thing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Some of the most strident pro-life women I have ever met were formerly subject to the coercion of a carefully worded "pitch" by the abortionist. Abortion is big business: In April, the annual report of Planned Parenthood Federation of America (largest abortion provider in America) revealed that the abortion giant had a total income of $1.02 billion—with reported profits of nearly $115 million. According to the Guttmacher Institute, abortionist murderers are now killing almost ONE QUARTER of our population. Margaret Sanger would be proud of this horrible eugenics program---it's what she always envisioned. And what market-distorting results do we get for those government incentives? 289,650 abortions in 2006. A researcher who has spent over a decade examining the economic impact of abortion finds that the approximately 50.5 million abortions in the U.S. since 1970 have cost the American economy $35 TRILLION. That comes in the form of lost productivity by having fewer workers contributing to society. Those contributions also come in the form of taxpayers contributing to state, federal and local governments that would have had more funds to pay teachers, offer health care benefits or put more police on the streets. The cost to the economy also includes the lost support for the social security system, which experts say still presents a host of challenges for the future and questions about whether younger Americans will receive anything from it... The question of the economic impact of abortion has come up before. Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute said last year that “When you look at the projections that show our population aging rapidly over the next few decades, when you see our economy and government programs such as Social Security risking bankruptcy, you can see that the United States’ annual 0.9% population growth rate is not enough." http://www.lifenews.com/nat2662.html Howard has been warning since 1997 that the US faced a major financial crisis based on ongoing demographic trends. In 1997, he wrote: “I see little hope that we can avoid an eventual crash on Wall Street that will make the 1930’s looking like cashing in your cards after a bad game of Monopoly." He cites the Soviet Union as an example of a nation that allowed unlimited abortions to wreck its economy. “The main reason for their collapse was internal – 300 abortions for every 100 live birth," he said. "Right now, there are not enough younger women to reverse their population decline. They are expected to lose another 40 million people between now and 2050.” more on that here: http://www.lifenews.com/nat4440.html |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The child is still dead. |
Quote:
Have you read it, Bro. Parrish? You'd love it. |
No brother I haven't read that book, but thanks for the heads up, I might check into it...
|
I am actually going through something similar right now. I am pregnant with my second child and they found a blood clot in my uterus. There is a possibility that this blood clot could cause a uterine rupture and if this happens, they would have no choice but to take the baby. I am over 19 weeks pregnant a uterine rupture could kill me and the baby, the baby would have a very, very small chance of surviving, but it would still be more of a chance than leaving him in the womb. If they end up having to take him before 24 weeks, he won't be considered "viable" and if he doesn't survive, it would be considered a partial birth abortion. This is a very tough situation, but I wouldn't consider for a second not trying everything to save his life and my life, since I have a 16 month at home. If something does happen and he doesn't survive, would I consider myself a murderer? No, because I would have done what was necessary to try and save us both.
|
Comments: y s_vandeusen8402
Quote:
Aloha sister, I am in complete agreement with you and hope and pray that you will not have to face this ordeal. But, and if you do, I believe you will have done everything humanly possible, and as such, I believe your judgment to be Scriptural and justified. Don't let anyone (anywhere) put a load of "guilt" upon you - whatever you and your husband decide! :( May God bless you, your husband, your toddler, and your unborn child. |
Quote:
Thank you so much for your kind words and prayers, they really mean a lot to me. This is a very difficult time for me and my family and I am very appreciative of your support. :o God Bless |
Quote:
Because, in later pregnancy before the baby is considered "age of viability" (which is 24 weeks) it's usually not done to "kill" the baby to save the mother. If there is a life threatening condition concerning the mother and the baby, the baby is taken early for a better chance of survival, it's done to save both of them. It is true that if the baby doesn't survive and it is born before 24 weeks, it's listed as partial birth abortion, but it is in no means a purposeful one. It is done to give the baby the best chance of survival, when it's life is threaten because the womb and the mother's body can no longer support it's life. |
Quote:
It is very easy to say what one would do IF faced with a certain situation, but it is completely different when the situation becomes reality. I hope beyond hope that you never have to face a situation like this, but please do not be quick to judge others. |
Quote:
Thank you so much for your kind words and prayer. They really mean a lot to me during this difficult time. God Bless You!!! |
Quote:
|
There are two situations that truly threaten the life of the mother....at least two that I know about. Abruptio placentae and placenta previa. These can happen from very early on in a pregnancy to labor and childbirth. In the early months of childbirth, where the baby is not viable outside the womb is a good example to use. Abruptio placentae, if not repaired will most likely kill the mother and the baby has no chance to survive. I've seen this in the field and I've seen women die. Even in rare situations like this, it's very hard to make the decision to save the mother's life, but to allow her to die would be even more of a senseless act. I would pray that God would bless my wife with the ability to have more children after a situation like this rather than losing both. I don't consider that an abortion either as in either case the placenta, which is the life-support for the baby in the womb, is damaged beyond repair.
|
My daughter was diagnosed with placenta previa very early during her last pregnancy. Through continued prayer, the situation was cured and she gave birth in December.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Website © AV1611.Com.
Posts represent only the opinions of users of this forum and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the webmaster.